[clang] 47747da - [clang] Handle templated operators with reversed arguments (#69595)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 20 05:40:29 PDT 2023
Author: Utkarsh Saxena
Date: 2023-10-20T14:40:25+02:00
New Revision: 47747da6340b00e301d3656f95ecf9b04a6ec2bb
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/47747da6340b00e301d3656f95ecf9b04a6ec2bb
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/47747da6340b00e301d3656f95ecf9b04a6ec2bb.diff
LOG: [clang] Handle templated operators with reversed arguments (#69595)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68999 correctly computed
conversion sequence for reversed args to a template operators. This was
a breaking change as code, previously accepted in C++17, starts to break
in C++20.
Example:
```cpp
struct P {};
template<class S> bool operator==(const P&, const S &);
struct A : public P {};
struct B : public P {};
bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // This is now ambiguous in C++20.
```
In order to minimise widespread breakages, as a clang extension, we had
previously accepted such ambiguities with a warning
(`-Wambiguous-reversed-operator`) for non-template operators. Due to the
same reasons, we extend this relaxation for template operators.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53954
Added:
Modified:
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
clang/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.funcs/over.match.oper/p3-2a.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index fc8caf9221b9d29..848f3559d06ff8a 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -37,6 +37,27 @@ These changes are ones which we think may surprise users when upgrading to
Clang |release| because of the opportunity they pose for disruption to existing
code bases.
+- Fix a bug in reversed argument for templated operators.
+ This breaks code in C++20 which was previously accepted in C++17. Eg:
+
+ .. code-block:: cpp
+
+ struct P {};
+ template<class S> bool operator==(const P&, const S&);
+
+ struct A : public P {};
+ struct B : public P {};
+
+ // This equality is now ambiguous in C++20.
+ bool ambiguous(A a, B b) { return a == b; }
+
+ template<class S> bool operator!=(const P&, const S&);
+ // Ok. Found a matching operator!=.
+ bool fine(A a, B b) { return a == b; }
+
+ To reduce such widespread breakages, as an extension, Clang accepts this code
+ with an existing warning ``-Wambiguous-reversed-operator`` warning.
+ Fixes `GH <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53954>`_.
C/C++ Language Potentially Breaking Changes
-------------------------------------------
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index ce78994e6553814..d57a7ad8f46859a 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -7688,7 +7688,7 @@ bool Sema::CheckNonDependentConversions(
QualType ParamType = ParamTypes[I + Offset];
if (!ParamType->isDependentType()) {
unsigned ConvIdx = PO == OverloadCandidateParamOrder::Reversed
- ? 0
+ ? Args.size() - 1 - (ThisConversions + I)
: (ThisConversions + I);
Conversions[ConvIdx]
= TryCopyInitialization(*this, Args[I], ParamType,
@@ -10085,11 +10085,19 @@ getImplicitObjectParamType(ASTContext &Context, const FunctionDecl *F) {
return M->getFunctionObjectParameterReferenceType();
}
-static bool haveSameParameterTypes(ASTContext &Context, const FunctionDecl *F1,
- const FunctionDecl *F2) {
+// As a Clang extension, allow ambiguity among F1 and F2 if they represent
+// represent the same entity.
+static bool allowAmbiguity(ASTContext &Context, const FunctionDecl *F1,
+ const FunctionDecl *F2) {
if (declaresSameEntity(F1, F2))
return true;
-
+ if (F1->isTemplateInstantiation() && F2->isTemplateInstantiation() &&
+ declaresSameEntity(F1->getPrimaryTemplate(), F2->getPrimaryTemplate())) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ // TODO: It is not clear whether comparing parameters is necessary (i.e.
+ //
diff erent functions with same params). Consider removing this (as no test
+ // fail w/o it).
auto NextParam = [&](const FunctionDecl *F, unsigned &I, bool First) {
if (First) {
if (std::optional<QualType> T = getImplicitObjectParamType(Context, F))
@@ -10274,14 +10282,14 @@ bool clang::isBetterOverloadCandidate(
case ImplicitConversionSequence::Worse:
if (Cand1.Function && Cand2.Function &&
Cand1.isReversed() != Cand2.isReversed() &&
- haveSameParameterTypes(S.Context, Cand1.Function, Cand2.Function)) {
+ allowAmbiguity(S.Context, Cand1.Function, Cand2.Function)) {
// Work around large-scale breakage caused by considering reversed
// forms of operator== in C++20:
//
- // When comparing a function against a reversed function with the same
- // parameter types, if we have a better conversion for one argument and
- // a worse conversion for the other, the implicit conversion sequences
- // are treated as being equally good.
+ // When comparing a function against a reversed function, if we have a
+ // better conversion for one argument and a worse conversion for the
+ // other, the implicit conversion sequences are treated as being equally
+ // good.
//
// This prevents a comparison function from being considered ambiguous
// with a reversed form that is written in the same way.
@@ -14421,7 +14429,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::CreateOverloadedBinOp(SourceLocation OpLoc,
llvm::SmallVector<FunctionDecl*, 4> AmbiguousWith;
for (OverloadCandidate &Cand : CandidateSet) {
if (Cand.Viable && Cand.Function && Cand.isReversed() &&
- haveSameParameterTypes(Context, Cand.Function, FnDecl)) {
+ allowAmbiguity(Context, Cand.Function, FnDecl)) {
for (unsigned ArgIdx = 0; ArgIdx < 2; ++ArgIdx) {
if (CompareImplicitConversionSequences(
*this, OpLoc, Cand.Conversions[ArgIdx],
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.funcs/over.match.oper/p3-2a.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.funcs/over.match.oper/p3-2a.cpp
index 5c6804eb7726b5f..5727d506fe5e61d 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.funcs/over.match.oper/p3-2a.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.funcs/over.match.oper/p3-2a.cpp
@@ -324,6 +324,67 @@ bool x = X() == X(); // expected-warning {{ambiguous}}
}
} // namespace P2468R2
+namespace GH53954{
+namespace friend_template_1 {
+struct P {
+ template <class T>
+ friend bool operator==(const P&, const T&); // expected-note {{candidate}} \
+ // expected-note {{ambiguous candidate function with reversed arguments}}
+};
+struct A : public P {};
+struct B : public P {};
+bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // expected-warning {{use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'A' and 'B') to be ambiguous}}
+}
+
+namespace friend_template_2 {
+struct P {
+ template <class T>
+ friend bool operator==(const T&, const P&); // expected-note {{candidate}} \
+ // expected-note {{ambiguous candidate function with reversed arguments}}
+};
+struct A : public P {};
+struct B : public P {};
+bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // expected-warning {{use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'A' and 'B') to be ambiguous}}
+}
+
+namespace member_template {
+struct P {
+ template<class S>
+ bool operator==(const S &) const; // expected-note {{candidate}} \
+ // expected-note {{ambiguous candidate function with reversed arguments}}
+};
+struct A : public P {};
+struct B : public P {};
+bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // expected-warning {{use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'A' and 'B') to be ambiguous}}
+}
+
+namespace non_member_template_1 {
+struct P {};
+template<class S>
+bool operator==(const P&, const S &); // expected-note {{candidate}} \
+ // expected-note {{ambiguous candidate function with reversed arguments}}
+
+struct A : public P {};
+struct B : public P {};
+bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // expected-warning {{use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'A' and 'B') to be ambiguous}}
+
+template<class S>
+bool operator!=(const P&, const S &);
+bool fine(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // Ok. Found a matching operator!=.
+}
+}
+
+namespace non_member_template_2 {
+struct P {};
+template<class S>
+bool operator==(const S&, const P&); // expected-note {{candidate}} \
+ // expected-note {{ambiguous candidate function with reversed arguments}}
+
+struct A : public P {};
+struct B : public P {};
+bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // expected-warning {{use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types 'A' and 'B') to be ambiguous}}
+}
+
#else // NO_ERRORS
namespace problem_cases {
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list