[clang] Fix crash with modules and constexpr destructor (PR #69076)

Vassil Vassilev via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 16 20:04:38 PDT 2023


================
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: split-file %s %t
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-obj -fmodules -fimplicit-module-maps -fmodules-cache-path=%t %t/main.cpp -o %t/main.o
+
+//--- V.h
+#ifndef V_H
+#define V_H
+
+class A {
+public:
+  constexpr A() { }
+  constexpr ~A() { }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class V {
+public:
+  V() = default;
+
+  constexpr V(int n, const A& a = A()) {}
+};
+
+#endif
+
+//--- inst1.h
+#include "V.h"
+
+static void inst1() {
+  V<int> v;
+}
+
+//--- inst2.h
+#include "V.h"
+
+static void inst2() {
+  V<int> v(100);
+}
+
+//--- module.modulemap
+module "M" {
----------------
vgvassilev wrote:

Is that the new standard nowadays? Can we use `#pragma clang module build` and alike to express the module setup?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69076


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list