[clang-tools-extra] [InstCombine] Refactor matchFunnelShift to allow more pattern (NFC) (PR #68474)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2732,100 +2732,114 @@ static Instruction *matchFunnelShift(Instruction &Or, InstCombinerImpl &IC) {
   // rotate matching code under visitSelect and visitTrunc?
   unsigned Width = Or.getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
 
-  // First, find an or'd pair of opposite shifts:
-  // or (lshr ShVal0, ShAmt0), (shl ShVal1, ShAmt1)
-  BinaryOperator *Or0, *Or1;
-  if (!match(Or.getOperand(0), m_BinOp(Or0)) ||
-      !match(Or.getOperand(1), m_BinOp(Or1)))
-    return nullptr;
-
-  Value *ShVal0, *ShVal1, *ShAmt0, *ShAmt1;
-  if (!match(Or0, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal0), m_Value(ShAmt0)))) ||
-      !match(Or1, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal1), m_Value(ShAmt1)))) ||
-      Or0->getOpcode() == Or1->getOpcode())
+  Instruction *Or0, *Or1;
+  if (!match(Or.getOperand(0), m_Instruction(Or0)) ||
+      !match(Or.getOperand(1), m_Instruction(Or1)))
     return nullptr;
 
-  // Canonicalize to or(shl(ShVal0, ShAmt0), lshr(ShVal1, ShAmt1)).
-  if (Or0->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::LShr) {
-    std::swap(Or0, Or1);
-    std::swap(ShVal0, ShVal1);
-    std::swap(ShAmt0, ShAmt1);
-  }
-  assert(Or0->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::Shl &&
-         Or1->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::LShr &&
-         "Illegal or(shift,shift) pair");
-
-  // Match the shift amount operands for a funnel shift pattern. This always
-  // matches a subtraction on the R operand.
-  auto matchShiftAmount = [&](Value *L, Value *R, unsigned Width) -> Value * {
-    // Check for constant shift amounts that sum to the bitwidth.
-    const APInt *LI, *RI;
-    if (match(L, m_APIntAllowUndef(LI)) && match(R, m_APIntAllowUndef(RI)))
-      if (LI->ult(Width) && RI->ult(Width) && (*LI + *RI) == Width)
-        return ConstantInt::get(L->getType(), *LI);
-
-    Constant *LC, *RC;
-    if (match(L, m_Constant(LC)) && match(R, m_Constant(RC)) &&
-        match(L, m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, APInt(Width, Width))) &&
-        match(R, m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, APInt(Width, Width))) &&
-        match(ConstantExpr::getAdd(LC, RC), m_SpecificIntAllowUndef(Width)))
-      return ConstantExpr::mergeUndefsWith(LC, RC);
-
-    // (shl ShVal, X) | (lshr ShVal, (Width - x)) iff X < Width.
-    // We limit this to X < Width in case the backend re-expands the intrinsic,
-    // and has to reintroduce a shift modulo operation (InstCombine might remove
-    // it after this fold). This still doesn't guarantee that the final codegen
-    // will match this original pattern.
-    if (match(R, m_OneUse(m_Sub(m_SpecificInt(Width), m_Specific(L))))) {
-      KnownBits KnownL = IC.computeKnownBits(L, /*Depth*/ 0, &Or);
-      return KnownL.getMaxValue().ult(Width) ? L : nullptr;
-    }
+  bool IsFshl = true; // Sub on LSHR.
+  SmallVector<Value *, 3> FShiftArgs;
 
-    // For non-constant cases, the following patterns currently only work for
-    // rotation patterns.
-    // TODO: Add general funnel-shift compatible patterns.
-    if (ShVal0 != ShVal1)
+  // First, find an or'd pair of opposite shifts:
+  // or (lshr ShVal0, ShAmt0), (shl ShVal1, ShAmt1)
+  if (isa<BinaryOperator>(Or0) && isa<BinaryOperator>(Or1)) {
----------------
goldsteinn wrote:

What is the rationale for this check? Isn't it covered by the matching of logical shifts?

But either way, if it is indeed useful, can you invert it and early return to keep nested scopes down.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68474