[clang-tools-extra] [InstCombine] Refactor matchFunnelShift to allow more pattern (NFC) (PR #68474)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Oct 7 20:26:15 PDT 2023
https://github.com/HaohaiWen updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68474
>From 5b3b1bbb5b263bc5711adde031d85b1461ccbab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haohai Wen <haohai.wen at intel.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 13:48:32 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [InstCombine] Refactor matchFunnelShift to allow more pattern
(NFC)
Current implementation of matchFunnelShift only allows opposite shift
pattern. Refactor it to allow more pattern.
---
.../InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp | 172 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
index cbdab3e9c5fb91d..b04e070fd19d7d1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
@@ -2732,100 +2732,114 @@ static Instruction *matchFunnelShift(Instruction &Or, InstCombinerImpl &IC) {
// rotate matching code under visitSelect and visitTrunc?
unsigned Width = Or.getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
- // First, find an or'd pair of opposite shifts:
- // or (lshr ShVal0, ShAmt0), (shl ShVal1, ShAmt1)
- BinaryOperator *Or0, *Or1;
- if (!match(Or.getOperand(0), m_BinOp(Or0)) ||
- !match(Or.getOperand(1), m_BinOp(Or1)))
- return nullptr;
-
- Value *ShVal0, *ShVal1, *ShAmt0, *ShAmt1;
- if (!match(Or0, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal0), m_Value(ShAmt0)))) ||
- !match(Or1, m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal1), m_Value(ShAmt1)))) ||
- Or0->getOpcode() == Or1->getOpcode())
+ Instruction *Or0, *Or1;
+ if (!match(Or.getOperand(0), m_Instruction(Or0)) ||
+ !match(Or.getOperand(1), m_Instruction(Or1)))
return nullptr;
- // Canonicalize to or(shl(ShVal0, ShAmt0), lshr(ShVal1, ShAmt1)).
- if (Or0->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::LShr) {
- std::swap(Or0, Or1);
- std::swap(ShVal0, ShVal1);
- std::swap(ShAmt0, ShAmt1);
- }
- assert(Or0->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::Shl &&
- Or1->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::LShr &&
- "Illegal or(shift,shift) pair");
-
- // Match the shift amount operands for a funnel shift pattern. This always
- // matches a subtraction on the R operand.
- auto matchShiftAmount = [&](Value *L, Value *R, unsigned Width) -> Value * {
- // Check for constant shift amounts that sum to the bitwidth.
- const APInt *LI, *RI;
- if (match(L, m_APIntAllowUndef(LI)) && match(R, m_APIntAllowUndef(RI)))
- if (LI->ult(Width) && RI->ult(Width) && (*LI + *RI) == Width)
- return ConstantInt::get(L->getType(), *LI);
-
- Constant *LC, *RC;
- if (match(L, m_Constant(LC)) && match(R, m_Constant(RC)) &&
- match(L, m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, APInt(Width, Width))) &&
- match(R, m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, APInt(Width, Width))) &&
- match(ConstantExpr::getAdd(LC, RC), m_SpecificIntAllowUndef(Width)))
- return ConstantExpr::mergeUndefsWith(LC, RC);
-
- // (shl ShVal, X) | (lshr ShVal, (Width - x)) iff X < Width.
- // We limit this to X < Width in case the backend re-expands the intrinsic,
- // and has to reintroduce a shift modulo operation (InstCombine might remove
- // it after this fold). This still doesn't guarantee that the final codegen
- // will match this original pattern.
- if (match(R, m_OneUse(m_Sub(m_SpecificInt(Width), m_Specific(L))))) {
- KnownBits KnownL = IC.computeKnownBits(L, /*Depth*/ 0, &Or);
- return KnownL.getMaxValue().ult(Width) ? L : nullptr;
- }
+ bool IsFshl = true; // Sub on LSHR.
+ SmallVector<Value *, 3> FShiftArgs;
- // For non-constant cases, the following patterns currently only work for
- // rotation patterns.
- // TODO: Add general funnel-shift compatible patterns.
- if (ShVal0 != ShVal1)
+ // First, find an or'd pair of opposite shifts:
+ // or (lshr ShVal0, ShAmt0), (shl ShVal1, ShAmt1)
+ if (isa<BinaryOperator>(Or0) && isa<BinaryOperator>(Or1)) {
+ Value *ShVal0, *ShVal1, *ShAmt0, *ShAmt1;
+ if (!match(Or0,
+ m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal0), m_Value(ShAmt0)))) ||
+ !match(Or1,
+ m_OneUse(m_LogicalShift(m_Value(ShVal1), m_Value(ShAmt1)))) ||
+ Or0->getOpcode() == Or1->getOpcode())
return nullptr;
- // For non-constant cases we don't support non-pow2 shift masks.
- // TODO: Is it worth matching urem as well?
- if (!isPowerOf2_32(Width))
- return nullptr;
+ // Canonicalize to or(shl(ShVal0, ShAmt0), lshr(ShVal1, ShAmt1)).
+ if (Or0->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::LShr) {
+ std::swap(Or0, Or1);
+ std::swap(ShVal0, ShVal1);
+ std::swap(ShAmt0, ShAmt1);
+ }
+ assert(Or0->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::Shl &&
+ Or1->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::LShr &&
+ "Illegal or(shift,shift) pair");
+
+ // Match the shift amount operands for a funnel shift pattern. This always
+ // matches a subtraction on the R operand.
+ auto matchShiftAmount = [&](Value *L, Value *R, unsigned Width) -> Value * {
+ // Check for constant shift amounts that sum to the bitwidth.
+ const APInt *LI, *RI;
+ if (match(L, m_APIntAllowUndef(LI)) && match(R, m_APIntAllowUndef(RI)))
+ if (LI->ult(Width) && RI->ult(Width) && (*LI + *RI) == Width)
+ return ConstantInt::get(L->getType(), *LI);
+
+ Constant *LC, *RC;
+ if (match(L, m_Constant(LC)) && match(R, m_Constant(RC)) &&
+ match(L,
+ m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, APInt(Width, Width))) &&
+ match(R,
+ m_SpecificInt_ICMP(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, APInt(Width, Width))) &&
+ match(ConstantExpr::getAdd(LC, RC), m_SpecificIntAllowUndef(Width)))
+ return ConstantExpr::mergeUndefsWith(LC, RC);
+
+ // (shl ShVal, X) | (lshr ShVal, (Width - x)) iff X < Width.
+ // We limit this to X < Width in case the backend re-expands the
+ // intrinsic, and has to reintroduce a shift modulo operation (InstCombine
+ // might remove it after this fold). This still doesn't guarantee that the
+ // final codegen will match this original pattern.
+ if (match(R, m_OneUse(m_Sub(m_SpecificInt(Width), m_Specific(L))))) {
+ KnownBits KnownL = IC.computeKnownBits(L, /*Depth*/ 0, &Or);
+ return KnownL.getMaxValue().ult(Width) ? L : nullptr;
+ }
- // The shift amount may be masked with negation:
- // (shl ShVal, (X & (Width - 1))) | (lshr ShVal, ((-X) & (Width - 1)))
- Value *X;
- unsigned Mask = Width - 1;
- if (match(L, m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask))) &&
- match(R, m_And(m_Neg(m_Specific(X)), m_SpecificInt(Mask))))
- return X;
+ // For non-constant cases, the following patterns currently only work for
+ // rotation patterns.
+ // TODO: Add general funnel-shift compatible patterns.
+ if (ShVal0 != ShVal1)
+ return nullptr;
- // Similar to above, but the shift amount may be extended after masking,
- // so return the extended value as the parameter for the intrinsic.
- if (match(L, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) &&
- match(R, m_And(m_Neg(m_ZExt(m_And(m_Specific(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))),
- m_SpecificInt(Mask))))
- return L;
+ // For non-constant cases we don't support non-pow2 shift masks.
+ // TODO: Is it worth matching urem as well?
+ if (!isPowerOf2_32(Width))
+ return nullptr;
- if (match(L, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) &&
- match(R, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Neg(m_Specific(X)), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))))
- return L;
+ // The shift amount may be masked with negation:
+ // (shl ShVal, (X & (Width - 1))) | (lshr ShVal, ((-X) & (Width - 1)))
+ Value *X;
+ unsigned Mask = Width - 1;
+ if (match(L, m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask))) &&
+ match(R, m_And(m_Neg(m_Specific(X)), m_SpecificInt(Mask))))
+ return X;
+
+ // Similar to above, but the shift amount may be extended after masking,
+ // so return the extended value as the parameter for the intrinsic.
+ if (match(L, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) &&
+ match(R,
+ m_And(m_Neg(m_ZExt(m_And(m_Specific(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))),
+ m_SpecificInt(Mask))))
+ return L;
+
+ if (match(L, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Value(X), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))) &&
+ match(R, m_ZExt(m_And(m_Neg(m_Specific(X)), m_SpecificInt(Mask)))))
+ return L;
- return nullptr;
- };
+ return nullptr;
+ };
- Value *ShAmt = matchShiftAmount(ShAmt0, ShAmt1, Width);
- bool IsFshl = true; // Sub on LSHR.
- if (!ShAmt) {
- ShAmt = matchShiftAmount(ShAmt1, ShAmt0, Width);
- IsFshl = false; // Sub on SHL.
+ Value *ShAmt = matchShiftAmount(ShAmt0, ShAmt1, Width);
+ if (!ShAmt) {
+ ShAmt = matchShiftAmount(ShAmt1, ShAmt0, Width);
+ IsFshl = false; // Sub on SHL.
+ }
+ if (!ShAmt)
+ return nullptr;
+
+ FShiftArgs = {ShVal0, ShVal1, ShAmt};
}
- if (!ShAmt)
+
+ if (FShiftArgs.empty())
return nullptr;
Intrinsic::ID IID = IsFshl ? Intrinsic::fshl : Intrinsic::fshr;
Function *F = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(Or.getModule(), IID, Or.getType());
- return CallInst::Create(F, {ShVal0, ShVal1, ShAmt});
+ return CallInst::Create(F, FShiftArgs);
}
/// Attempt to combine or(zext(x),shl(zext(y),bw/2) concat packing patterns.
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list