[clang] llvm-canon (PR #68176)

[Puyan Lotfi via cfe-commits]

plotfi wrote:

I recall approving the original PR on phab. I can re-review if needed. This work was approved to land before, so personally I think it might be overkill to RFC it on discourse again but I am not certain of the right process to take. 

> Added @plotfi as a reviewer; one drive-by question is whether adding a new LLVM tool like this requires an RFC to be posted to Discourse or not (https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#introducing-new-components-into-llvm). (I don't have any opinions on the tool; just trying to help the review move along.)



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68176