[clang] [Sema] Add check for bitfield assignments to larger integral types (PR #68276)
via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Oct 4 17:53:04 PDT 2023
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
We noticed that clang does not check for bitfield assignment widths, while gcc does check this.
gcc produced a warning like so for it's -Wconversion flag:
$ gcc -Wconversion -c test.c
test.c: In function 'foo':
test.c:10:15: warning: conversion from 'int' to 'signed char:7' may change value [-Wconversion]
10 | vxx.bf = x; // no warning
| ^
This option is disabled by default, and is enabled by usign the -Wbitfield-width option.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68276.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (+3)
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp (+10)
- (added) clang/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-width.c (+30)
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index e2eaeb885e2ea77..9ffb7baacac22d7 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -6165,6 +6165,9 @@ def warn_signed_bitfield_enum_conversion : Warning<
"signed bit-field %0 needs an extra bit to represent the largest positive "
"enumerators of %1">,
InGroup<BitFieldEnumConversion>, DefaultIgnore;
+def warn_bitfield_too_small_for_integral_type : Warning<
+ "bit-field %0 is not wide enough to store type of %1 ">,
+ InGroup<BitFieldWidth>, DefaultIgnore;
def note_change_bitfield_sign : Note<
"consider making the bitfield type %select{unsigned|signed}0">;
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
index 3b0cc154c2e46ab..eb567bc4935e768 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
@@ -14300,6 +14300,16 @@ static bool AnalyzeBitFieldAssignment(Sema &S, FieldDecl *Bitfield, Expr *Init,
S.Diag(WidthExpr->getExprLoc(), diag::note_widen_bitfield)
<< BitsNeeded << ED << WidthExpr->getSourceRange();
}
+ } else if (OriginalInit->getType()->isIntegralType(S.Context)) {
+ TypeInfo TI = S.Context.getTypeInfo(OriginalInit->getType());
+ if (TI.Width > FieldWidth) {
+ Expr *WidthExpr = Bitfield->getBitWidth();
+ S.Diag(InitLoc, diag::warn_bitfield_too_small_for_integral_type)
+ << Bitfield << OriginalInit->getType();
+ S.Diag(WidthExpr->getExprLoc(), diag::note_widen_bitfield)
+ << TI.Width << OriginalInit->getType()
+ << WidthExpr->getSourceRange();
+ }
}
return false;
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-width.c b/clang/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-width.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..69aa2e229869906
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/bitfield-width.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wbitfield-width -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+typedef struct _xx {
+ int bf:9; // expected-note{{widen this field to 32 bits to store all values of 'int'}}
+ // expected-note at -1{{widen this field to 16 bits to store all values of 'short'}}
+ // expected-note at -2{{widen this field to 64 bits to store all values of 'long'}}
+ // expected-note at -3{{widen this field to 32 bits to store all values of 'int'}}
+ } xx, *pxx;
+
+ xx vxx;
+
+ void foo1(int x) {
+ vxx.bf = x; // expected-warning{{bit-field 'bf' is not wide enough to store type of 'int'}}
+ }
+ void foo2(short x) {
+ vxx.bf = x; // expected-warning{{bit-field 'bf' is not wide enough to store type of 'short'}}
+ }
+ void foo3(char x) {
+ vxx.bf = x;
+ }
+ void foo4(long x) {
+ vxx.bf = x; // expected-warning{{bit-field 'bf' is not wide enough to store type of 'long'}}
+ }
+ void foo5(void * x) {
+ vxx.bf = (int)x; // expected-warning{{cast to smaller integer type 'int' from 'void *'}}
+ // expected-warning at -1{{bit-field 'bf' is not wide enough to store type of 'int'}}
+ }
+ int fee(void) {
+ return 0;
+ }
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68276
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list