[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] The first PR our of many PRs for the "Initialized Class Members" check. (PR #65189)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - google-cpp-init-class-members
+
+google-cpp-init-class-members
+=============================
+
+Checks that class members are initialized in constructors (implicitly or
+explicitly). Reports constructors or classes where class members are not
+initialized. The goal of this checker is to eliminate UUM (Use of
+Uninitialized Memory) bugs caused by uninitialized class members.
+
+This checker is different from ProTypeMemberInitCheck in that this checker
+attempts to eliminate UUMs as a bug class, at the expense of false
+positives.
+
+This checker is WIP. We are incrementally adding features and increasing
+coverage until we get to a shape that is acceptable.
+
+For now, this checker reports `X` in the following two patterns:
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+  class SomeClass {
+  public:
+    SomeClass() = default;
+
+  private:
+    int X;
+  };
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+  struct SomeStruct {
+    int X;
+  };
----------------
adriannistor wrote:

I am not closing this because technically I did not change the code. However, if you think the comment above fully addresses this issue, please close this (if the comment does not fully address, please let me know what you think! --- thanks!)



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65189