[clang-tools-extra] [clang-tidy] The first PR our of many PRs for the "Initialized Class Members" check. (PR #65189)

[via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+//===--- CppInitClassMembersCheck.cpp - clang-tidy ------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "CppInitClassMembersCheck.h"
+#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Decl.h"
+#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersMacros.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+
+namespace clang::tidy::google {
+
+namespace {
+
+// Matches records that have a default constructor.
+AST_MATCHER(CXXRecordDecl, hasDefaultConstructor) {
+  return Node.hasDefaultConstructor();
+}
+
+// Returns the names of `Fields` in a comma separated string.
+std::string
+toCommaSeparatedString(const SmallVector<const FieldDecl *, 16> &Fields) {
+  std::string Buffer;
+  llvm::raw_string_ostream OS(Buffer);
+  llvm::interleave(
+      Fields, OS, [&OS](const FieldDecl *Decl) { OS << Decl->getName(); },
+      ", ");
+  return Buffer;
+}
+
+// Returns `true` for field types that should be reported (if additional
+// conditions are also met). For example, returns `true` for `int` because an
+// uninitialized `int` field can contain uninitialized values.
+bool shouldReportThisFieldType(QualType Ty) {
+  if (Ty.isNull())
+    return false;
+
+  // FIXME: For now, this checker focuses on several allowlisted types. We will
+  // expand coverage in future.
+  return Ty->isIntegerType() || Ty->isBooleanType();
+}
+
+} // anonymous namespace
+
+void CppInitClassMembersCheck::checkMissingMemberInitializer(
+    ASTContext &Context, const CXXRecordDecl &ClassDecl,
+    const CXXConstructorDecl *Ctor) {
+  SmallVector<const FieldDecl *, 16> FieldsToReport;
+
+  for (const FieldDecl *F : ClassDecl.fields()) {
+    if (shouldReportThisFieldType(F->getType()) && !F->hasInClassInitializer())
+      FieldsToReport.push_back(F);
+  }
+
+  if (FieldsToReport.empty())
+    return;
+
+  DiagnosticBuilder Diag =
----------------
adriannistor wrote:

Thanks for the feedback! I added this in an internal Feature Request tracker for this check (I have two other internal reviewers who suggested something similar, so I am clustering this feedback and I will implement a version that meets all 3 feedback: from you and from the two reviewers).

Is tracking this as a Feature Request internally ok ? Or would you prefer I open a Feature Request in the [LLVM tracker](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues). I am a bit worried that, with this check being in very early stages, I will just be spamming the LLVM tracker with feature requests for an under-development check. However, if you think using the LLVM tracker is the right thing to do, I would be very glad to use the LLVM tracker, just let me know! Thanks! 



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65189