[clang] [clang][dataflow] Merge `RecordValue`s with different locations correctly. (PR #65319)

[Kinuko Yasuda via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -121,18 +121,18 @@ static Value *mergeDistinctValues(QualType Type, Value &Val1,
 
   Value *MergedVal = nullptr;
   if (auto *RecordVal1 = dyn_cast<RecordValue>(&Val1)) {
-    [[maybe_unused]] auto *RecordVal2 = cast<RecordValue>(&Val2);
-
-    // Values to be merged are always associated with the same location in
-    // `LocToVal`. The location stored in `RecordVal` should therefore also
-    // be the same.
-    assert(&RecordVal1->getLoc() == &RecordVal2->getLoc());
-
-    // `RecordVal1` and `RecordVal2` may have different properties associated
-    // with them. Create a new `RecordValue` without any properties so that we
-    // soundly approximate both values. If a particular analysis needs to merge
-    // properties, it should do so in `DataflowAnalysis::merge()`.
-    MergedVal = &MergedEnv.create<RecordValue>(RecordVal1->getLoc());
+    auto *RecordVal2 = cast<RecordValue>(&Val2);
+
+    if (&RecordVal1->getLoc() == &RecordVal2->getLoc())
+      // `RecordVal1` and `RecordVal2` may have different properties associated
+      // with them. Create a new `RecordValue` without any properties so that we
+      // soundly approximate both values. If a particular analysis needs to
+      // merge properties, it should do so in `DataflowAnalysis::merge()`.
+      MergedVal = &MergedEnv.create<RecordValue>(RecordVal1->getLoc());
+    else
+      // If the locations for the two records are different, need to create a
+      // completely new value.
----------------
kinu wrote:

Given that how cryptic when this could happen, it might be helpful to have a brief comment that both could happen depending on a subtle order of CFG and therefore how merge happens.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65319