[PATCH] D141757: [clangd] allow extracting to variable for lambda expressions
Nathan Ridge via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 4 01:19:26 PDT 2023
nridge added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/ExtractVariable.cpp:102
+
+ if (clang::Expr *const RequiresClause =
+ LExpr->getTrailingRequiresClause();
----------------
nit: just `if (clang::Expr *const RequiresClause = LExpr->getTrailingRequiresClause())` is equivalent
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/ExtractVariable.cpp:187
+ // Allow expressions, but only allow completely selected lambda
+ // expressions or unselected lambda expressions that are the parent of
+ // the originally selected node, not partially selected lambda
----------------
5chmidti wrote:
> nridge wrote:
> > I think it's worth adding to the comment *why* we allow unselected lambda expressions (to allow extracting from capture initializers), as it's not obvious
> I changed the previous return of `!isa<LambdaExpr>(Stmt) || InsertionPoint->Selected != SelectionTree::Partial;` to a simple `return true;`. None of my partial selection tests fail and I can't think of a case where the lambda would be partially selected.
Hmm, so what actually happens in these testcases?
```
// lambdas: partially selected
[][[(){}]];
[]()[[{}]];
[ [[ ](){}]];
```
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141757/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141757
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list