[PATCH] D148997: [clang] Add a new annotation token: annot_repl_input_end

[Ben Barham via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

bnbarham added a comment.

In D148997#4561620 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D148997#4561620>, @v.g.vassilev wrote:

> So, in that case we should bring back the boolean flag for incremental processing and keep the `IncrementalExtensions` LanguageOption separate. In that case `IncrementalExtensions` would mean that we must turn on incremental processing for managing lifetime and only use the language option when extending the parsing logic. However, I think the problem would be what to do with the `tok::eof` and `tok::annot_repl_input_end`? I'd probably need @aaron.ballman or @rsmith here...

Would you be happy to make that change, or should I put it up? Separating the options and what to do about the token in general could be separate PRs.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D148997/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D148997