[clang] 58696d2 - [clang][X86] Add __cpuidex function to cpuid.h

[Aiden Grossman via cfe-commits]

Author: Aiden Grossman
Date: 2023-08-19T17:12:23-07:00
New Revision: 58696d2f5bbae32dddcaec6891293e769465e77c

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58696d2f5bbae32dddcaec6891293e769465e77c
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58696d2f5bbae32dddcaec6891293e769465e77c.diff

LOG: [clang][X86] Add __cpuidex function to cpuid.h

MSVC has a __cpuidex function implemented to call the underlying cpuid
instruction which accepts a leaf, subleaf, and data array that the output
data is written into. This patch adds this functionality into clang
under the cpuid.h header. This also makes clang match GCC's behavior.
GCC has had __cpuidex in its cpuid.h since 2020.

Added: 
    clang/test/Headers/__cpuidex_conflict.c

Modified: 
    clang/lib/Headers/cpuid.h
    clang/test/Headers/cpuid.c

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/lib/Headers/cpuid.h b/clang/lib/Headers/cpuid.h
index 1ad6853a97c9d2..9b31db9f7d4f32 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Headers/cpuid.h
+++ b/clang/lib/Headers/cpuid.h
@@ -328,4 +328,14 @@ static __inline int __get_cpuid_count (unsigned int __leaf,
     return 1;
 }
 
+// In some configurations, __cpuidex is defined as a builtin (primarily
+// -fms-extensions) which will conflict with the __cpuidex definition below.
+#if !(__has_builtin(__cpuidex))
+static __inline void __cpuidex (int __cpu_info[4], int __leaf, int __subleaf)
+{
+  __cpuid_count(__leaf, __subleaf, __cpu_info[0], __cpu_info[1], __cpu_info[2],
+                __cpu_info[3]);
+}
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __CPUID_H */

diff  --git a/clang/test/Headers/__cpuidex_conflict.c b/clang/test/Headers/__cpuidex_conflict.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..8687a6aa2f897a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Headers/__cpuidex_conflict.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// Make sure that __cpuidex in cpuid.h doesn't conflict with the MS
+// extensions built in by ensuring compilation succeeds:
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -ffreestanding -fms-extensions -fms-compatibility \
+// RUN:  -fms-compatibility-version=19.00 -triple x86_64-pc-windows-msvc -emit-llvm -o -
+// %clang_cc1 %s -ffreestanding -triple x86_64-w64-windows-gnu -fms-extensions -emit-llvm -o -
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -ffreestanding -fopenmp -fopenmp-is-target-device -aux-triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
+
+typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+
+// We declare __cpuidex here as where the buitlin should be exposed (MSVC), the
+// declaration is in <intrin.h>, but <intrin.h> is not available from all the
+// targets that are being tested here.
+void __cpuidex (int[4], int, int);
+
+#include <cpuid.h>
+
+int cpuid_info[4];
+
+void test_cpuidex(unsigned level, unsigned count) {
+  __cpuidex(cpuid_info, level, count);
+}
+

diff  --git a/clang/test/Headers/cpuid.c b/clang/test/Headers/cpuid.c
index 7e485495c10665..6ed12eca7a61d4 100644
--- a/clang/test/Headers/cpuid.c
+++ b/clang/test/Headers/cpuid.c
@@ -6,14 +6,19 @@
 
 // CHECK-64: {{.*}} call { i32, i32, i32, i32 } asm "  xchgq  %rbx,${1:q}\0A cpuid\0A xchgq %rbx,${1:q}", "={ax},=r,={cx},={dx},0,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}})
 // CHECK-64: {{.*}} call { i32, i32, i32, i32 } asm "  xchgq  %rbx,${1:q}\0A  cpuid\0A  xchgq  %rbx,${1:q}", "={ax},=r,={cx},={dx},0,2,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}}, i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}})
+// CHECK-64: {{.*}} call { i32, i32, i32, i32 } asm "  xchgq  %rbx,${1:q}\0A  cpuid\0A  xchgq  %rbx,${1:q}", "={ax},=r,={cx},={dx},0,2,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}}, i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}})
 
 // CHECK-32: {{.*}} call { i32, i32, i32, i32 } asm "cpuid", "={ax},={bx},={cx},={dx},0,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}})
 // CHECK-32: {{.*}} call { i32, i32, i32, i32 } asm "cpuid", "={ax},={bx},={cx},={dx},0,2,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}}, i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}})
+// CHECK-32: {{.*}} call { i32, i32, i32, i32 } asm "cpuid", "={ax},={bx},={cx},={dx},0,2,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}}, i32 %{{[a-z0-9]+}})
 
 unsigned eax0, ebx0, ecx0, edx0;
 unsigned eax1, ebx1, ecx1, edx1;
 
+int cpuid_info[4];
+
 void test_cpuid(unsigned level, unsigned count) {
   __cpuid(level, eax1, ebx1, ecx1, edx1);
   __cpuid_count(level, count, eax0, ebx0, ecx0, edx0);
+  __cpuidex(cpuid_info, level, count);
 }