[PATCH] D157905: [include-cleaner] Filter references to identity macros

Kadir Cetinkaya via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 16 01:43:59 PDT 2023


kadircet marked an inline comment as done.
kadircet added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/Analysis.cpp:43
+      // This results in surprising behavior from users point of view (we
+      // generate a usage of stdio.h, in places unrelated to standard library).
+      // FIXME: Also eliminate the false positives by treating declarations
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Comment nit: I'm having trouble imagining cases that are actually*unrelated* to the stdlib.
> 
> If `stderr` is an impl-defined macro, then the only way to use the name to refer to something else is if it's not defined (inside ifndef stderr, or if you can be sure your TU doesn't include stdio first). Seems implausible...
> 
> That said I feel like we've had this conversation before and I've just forgotten the details.
> If stderr is an impl-defined macro, then the only way to use the name to refer to something else is if it's not defined

That's absolutely right. The issue here is macro expansion triggers independent of the context, e.g.
```
#include <stdio.h>
namespace ns { void stderr(); }
void foo() { ns::stderr(); }
```

here we have a (well two) reference to `stderr` macro from stdandard library, which is not user's intent, but rather a quirk of the language.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/Analysis.cpp:44
+      // generate a usage of stdio.h, in places unrelated to standard library).
+      // FIXME: Also eliminate the false positives by treating declarations
+      // resulting from these expansions as used.
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Nit: "false positives" is a little unclear: positives for this function are negatives for walkAST and could be either for diagnostics.
> 
> Also, I think you mean *references* rather than declarations?
> 
this should've been "false negatives" from the "usedness perspective", we basically drop the reference to `ns::stderr` in above example, because the name is not spelled in the main file (but rather spelled inside a macro body).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D157905/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D157905



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list