[PATCH] D155081: Specify the developer policy around links to external resources

[Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG677326999f27: Specify the developer policy around links to external resources (authored by aaron.ballman).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D155081/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D155081

Files:
  llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst


Index: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst
===================================================================
--- llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst
+++ llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst
@@ -201,6 +201,11 @@
   entire failing program into ``llvm/test`` as this creates a *time-to-test*
   burden on all developers. Please keep them short.
 
+* Avoid adding links to resources that are not available to the entire
+  community, such as links to private bug trackers, internal corporate
+  documentation, etc. Instead, add sufficient comments to the test to provide
+  the context behind such links.
+
 Note that llvm/test and clang/test are designed for regression and small feature
 tests only. More extensive test cases (e.g., entire applications, benchmarks,
 etc) should be added to the ``llvm-test`` test suite.  The llvm-test suite is
@@ -256,6 +261,11 @@
    the change (more invasive changes require more testing). A reasonable subset
    might be something like "``llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks``".
 
+#. Ensure that links in source code and test files point to publicly available
+   resources and are used primarily to add additional information rather than
+   to supply critical context. The surrounding comments should be sufficient
+   to provide the context behind such links.
+
 Additionally, the committer is responsible for addressing any problems found in
 the future that the change is responsible for.  For example:
 
@@ -336,8 +346,6 @@
   code snippets and gory details should be left to bug comments, web
   review or the mailing list.
 
-* If the patch fixes a bug in GitHub Issues, please include the PR# in the message.
-
 * Text formatting and spelling should follow the same rules as documentation
   and in-code comments, ex. capitalization, full stop, etc.
 
@@ -346,8 +354,13 @@
   related commit. This could be as simple as "Revert commit NNNN because it
   caused PR#".
 
-* If the patch has been reviewed, add a link to its review page, as shown
-  `here <https://www.llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#committing-a-change>`_.
+* It is acceptable to add metadata to the commit message to automate processes,
+  including for downstream consumers. If the patch fixes a bug in GitHub Issues,
+  we encourage adding a reference to the issue being closed, as described
+  `here <https://llvm.org/docs/BugLifeCycle.html#resolving-closing-bugs>`_.
+  Other kinds of metadata are also acceptable, including links to resources
+  that are not available to the entire community. However, such links should
+  not be used in place of making the commit message self-explanatory.
 
 For minor violations of these recommendations, the community normally favors
 reminding the contributor of this policy over reverting. Minor corrections and


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D155081.550266.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2748 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20230815/92a74a8e/attachment.bin>