[PATCH] D140828: [C++] Implement "Deducing this" (P0847R7)

Corentin Jabot via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 7 23:55:13 PDT 2023


cor3ntin added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:7280
+  "a %select{function|lambda}0 with an explicit object parameter cannot "
+  "%select{be const|be mutable|have reference qualifiers|be volatile}1">;
+def err_invalid_explicit_object_type_in_lambda: Error<
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> I think you're missing `restrict` here as well. Perhaps this is a case where it's better to diagnose the qualifiers generically and rely on the diagnostic's source range? e.g., `cannot have qualifiers` instead of the current %1 selection. This also works around weird with things like `void func() const &;` where it has multiple qualifiers.
Forming a source range to the qualifiers may be challenging though.

In what case would `restrict` come into play?

```
struct test {
    void f() restrict;
};
```
does not seem valid, I'm assuming  it is in some language mode?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D140828/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D140828



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list