[PATCH] D153059: [-Wunsafe-buffer-usage] Group parameter fix-its

Ziqing Luo via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 4 17:53:50 PDT 2023


ziqingluo-90 added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Analysis/UnsafeBufferUsage.cpp:1891-1892
+  for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumParms; i++) {
+    if (!ParmsMask[i])
+      continue;
+
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> Speaking of [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156762#inline-1517322 |my comment on the other patch]].
> 
> Can we simply ask `Strategy` about the strategy for `FD->getParamDecl(i)` instead of passing a mask?
> 
> Eventually we'll have to do that anyway, given how different parameters can be assigned different strategies.
Yes.  I think using `Strategy` is the correct way to do it.  

Can I make it a follow-up patch?  I noticed that this line needs to be fixed:
```
  Strategy NaiveStrategy = getNaiveStrategy(UnsafeVars);
```
The `UnsafeVars` is the set of variables associated to all matched `FixableGadget`s.  There can be variables that is safe and do not need fix.  Their strategy is set to `std::span` currently which is not correct.  With this line being fixed, we can have examples like
```
void f(int * p) {
  int * q;
   q = p;
   p[5] = 5;
}
```
where `q`'s strategy is `WONTFIX` and `p`'s strategy is `std::span`.  The expression `q = p` can be fixed to `q = p.data()`.  It  currently has an empty fix-it, which is incorrect.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153059/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153059



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list