[PATCH] D156259: Fix a bug that erroneously placed function arguments on a new line despite all arguments being able to fit on the same line.

Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 27 13:28:57 PDT 2023


HazardyKnusperkeks added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:664-666
+    if ((Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_Cpp ||
+         Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_ObjC) &&
+        !Current.is(tok::comment) && PrevNonComment &&
----------------
jp4a50 wrote:
> HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > jp4a50 wrote:
> > > HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > > > Could move this out of the lambda.
> > > Not sure exactly what you're referring to here. Initialization of `PrevNonComment`?
> > > Not sure exactly what you're referring to here. Initialization of `PrevNonComment`?
> > 
> > No everything in the if before you go into the `PrevNonComment`. It is highlighted if you hover the comment.
> Ah, I see, thanks. Technically I could move that outside the lambda. I'm just not sure how it's better? Are you making the suggestion because it would make it clearer that this logic only applies to cpp/objc and/or because it means we could avoid capturing `Style`?
Can do how you want, I think avoid capturing `Style` would be nice. And you wouldn't search for `PrevNonComment` if you don't need to. This could also be done be reordering the statements and a new `return`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D156259/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D156259



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list