[PATCH] D112921: [clang] Enable sized deallocation by default in C++14 onwards
Mark de Wever via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 26 10:50:31 PDT 2023
Mordante added a comment.
In D112921#4535716 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921#4535716>, @wangpc wrote:
> In D112921#4532378 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921#4532378>, @Mordante wrote:
>
>> In D112921#4530916 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921#4530916>, @wangpc wrote:
>>
>>> In D112921#4529182 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921#4529182>, @Mordante wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed some of the CI jobs are still failing with the patch, I didn't look into them.
>>>
>>> I don't think they are related to this patch, so I rebased again. If still failed, I will try to fix them later.
>>
>> I see changes in the libc++ ABI list output
>>
>> Symbol added: _ZdlPvmSt11align_val_t
>> {'name': '_ZdlPvmSt11align_val_t', 'type': 'FUNC', 'is_defined': False}
>>
>> Symbol added: _ZdlPvm
>> {'name': '_ZdlPvm', 'type': 'FUNC', 'is_defined': False}
>>
>> SYMBOL REMOVED: _ZdlPvSt11align_val_t
>> {'is_defined': False, 'name': '_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t', 'type': 'FUNC'}
>>
>> Summary
>> Added: 2
>> Removed: 1
>> Changed: 0
>>
>> There seems to be small change in the symbol name. What does the `m` in the added symbol mean?
>>
>> _ZdlPvmSt11align_val_t - added
>> _ZdlPvSt11align_val_t - remove
>>
>> There is also a new symbol `_ZdlPvm` added.
>
> `m` means `unsigned long` in mangled name (5.1.5.2 Builtin types <https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#mangling-builtin>), which is the `size` of sized deallocation.
>
> $ c++filt _ZdlPvmSt11align_val_t _ZdlPvm
> operator delete(void*, unsigned long, std::align_val_t)
> operator delete(void*, unsigned long)
>
> I am not familiar with libcxx, can you please help me to fix these tests? I hope we can catch up with the release of LLVM 17.
Looking at the ABI list we currently have
_ZdlPv -> operator delete(void*) // this one is kept
_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t -> operator delete(void*, std::align_val_t) // this one is removed
You add the overloads
operator delete(void*, unsigned long, std::align_val_t)
operator delete(void*, unsigned long)
Looking in the current WP http://eel.is/c++draft/replacement.functions#lib:new,operator the removed overload is still listed there.
Do you know why `operator delete(void*)` and `operator delete(void*, unsigned long)` are both available?
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td:2728
+ PosFlag<SetTrue, [], "Enable C++14 sized global deallocation functions">,
+ NegFlag<SetFalse>, BothFlags<[CC1Option]>>;
defm aligned_allocation : BoolFOption<"aligned-allocation",
----------------
Can you update the test `test/Lexer/cxx-features.cpp` and remove `-fsized-deallocation` in C++14 and newer? This should no longer be required.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list