[clang] 569e99a - [clang][docs] Attempt to fix warning when building ReleaseNotes
Alex Bradbury via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 24 02:37:48 PDT 2023
Author: Alex Bradbury
Date: 2023-07-24T10:36:42+01:00
New Revision: 569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898.diff
LOG: [clang][docs] Attempt to fix warning when building ReleaseNotes
I believe my previous patch, 17a58b3ca7ec18585e9ea8ed8b39d72fe36fb6cb
introduced a warning here.
Added:
Modified:
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 1df474d2672720..8e19b3695ef49e 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ RISC-V Support
- The rules for ordering of extensions in ``-march`` strings were relaxed. A
canonical ordering is no longer enforced on ``z*``, ``s*``, and ``x*``
prefixed extensions.
-* An ABI mismatch between GCC and Clang related to the handling of empty
+- An ABI mismatch between GCC and Clang related to the handling of empty
structs in C++ parameter passing under the hard floating point calling
conventions was fixed.
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list