[clang] 569e99a - [clang][docs] Attempt to fix warning when building ReleaseNotes

Alex Bradbury via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 24 02:37:48 PDT 2023


Author: Alex Bradbury
Date: 2023-07-24T10:36:42+01:00
New Revision: 569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/569e99a471f618b7fdf045d5e96f21d3e3a7f898.diff

LOG: [clang][docs] Attempt to fix warning when building ReleaseNotes

I believe my previous patch, 17a58b3ca7ec18585e9ea8ed8b39d72fe36fb6cb
introduced a warning here.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 1df474d2672720..8e19b3695ef49e 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ RISC-V Support
 - The rules for ordering of extensions in ``-march`` strings were relaxed. A
   canonical ordering is no longer enforced on ``z*``, ``s*``, and ``x*``
   prefixed extensions.
-* An ABI mismatch between GCC and Clang related to the handling of empty
+- An ABI mismatch between GCC and Clang related to the handling of empty
   structs in C++ parameter passing under the hard floating point calling
   conventions was fixed.
 


        


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list