[PATCH] D155783: [clang-format] Fix variable lacks of blank when previous operator is star
Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 20 12:23:51 PDT 2023
HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment.
Please provide a diff with the full context (`-U999999` will do the trick).
And another context is needed, just `x * y` will never be (meaningful) be formatted. At least a `;` is missing, and I'd argue if your example is just
... something ...
x * y;
... something ...
Your patch is wrong. While it is of course possible to just multiply something and drop the result, that's nonsense.
If the overloaded `operator*` has side effects, that's also possible, but bad code.
But defining a pointer `y` pointing to type `x` and not initializing it directly is more often the case:
struct x;
x* y;
... something ...
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:96
EXPECT_EQ(0, ReplacementCount);
+ EXPECT_EQ("x*y",
+ format("x * y"));
----------------
This is the wrong place.
You want a TokenAnnotatorTests, there is UnderstandStarAmp or something like that.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155783/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155783
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list