[PATCH] D155729: [OptTable] Make explicitly included options override excluded ones
Justin Bogner via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 19 14:27:37 PDT 2023
bogner added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.h:40
+ Ignored = (1 << 18),
+ TargetSpecific = (1 << 19),
};
----------------
bob80905 wrote:
> Given that the id for these flags have changed, does it make sense to write a test that makes sure these flags with these bits still behave as expected? (Ignored and target specific, specifically).
The actual values of the flags aren't really visible anywhere (and in the case of ignored, it's actually just changing the value back to what it was before https://reviews.llvm.org/D128462). I'm not sure that there's much we can do to write such a test.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155729/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155729
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list