[PATCH] D151587: [clang][ConstantEmitter] have tryEmitPrivate[ForVarInit] try ConstExprEmitter fast-path first
Eli Friedman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 18 17:38:57 PDT 2023
efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:8360
+ // Do not constant fold an R-value.
+ if (Info.EvalMode == EvalInfo::EM_ConstantFold && !E->isLValue())
+ return false;
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> efriedma wrote:
> > Checking isLValue() doesn't make sense; consider:
> >
> > ```
> > struct R { mutable long x; };
> > struct Z { const R &x, y; };
> > Z z = { R{1}, z.x.x=10 };
> > ```
> >
> > Maybe also want to check for EM_IgnoreSideEffects? Not sure what cases, if any, that would affect.
> >
> > We should probably check `E->getStorageDuration() == SD_Static`. The cases where it's a local temporary don't hit the getOrCreateValue() codepath, so the evaluated value should be handled correctly.
> >
> > Checking EvalMode feels a little weird, but I guess it should do the right thing in the cases I can think of? I'd like a second opinion on this.
> Changing this condition to:
> ```
> if (E->getStorageDuration() == SD_Static &&
> Info.EvalMode == EvalInfo::EM_ConstantFold &&
> E->isXValue())
> return false;
> ```
> allows all tests in tree to pass, but messes up the test case you posted above. I'm trying to sus out what else might be different about that test case...we should return `false` for that, but I'm not sure what's different about that case.
>
> In particular, I was playing with `E->isUsableInConstantExpressions` and `E->getLifetimeExtendedTemporaryDecl()`, but getting your case to work, I end up regressing clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-require-constant-initialization.cpp...argh!!
Shouldn't that just be the following?
```
if (E->getStorageDuration() == SD_Static &&
Info.EvalMode == EvalInfo::EM_ConstantFold)
return false;
```
A materialized temporary is always going to be either an LValue or an XValue, and the difference between the two isn't relevant here.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151587/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151587
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list