[PATCH] D155445: [analyzer][docs] Add CSA release notes

Gábor Horváth via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 18 05:13:41 PDT 2023


xazax.hun accepted this revision.
xazax.hun added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:908
+  (`7cd1f3ad22e4 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7cd1f3ad22e4>`_)
+- Fixed a null-pointer dereference crash inside the ``MoveChecker``.
+  (`d172b65ef001 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d172b65ef001>`_)
----------------
steakhal wrote:
> xazax.hun wrote:
> > steakhal wrote:
> > > xazax.hun wrote:
> > > > I think we usually do not mention crash fixes in the changelog. We have them in almost every release and sometimes there are quite a few of them.
> > > I won't mention the explicit commit where it was fixed.
> > > However, downstream users might wanna know about crashes and fixes that happened in this release.
> > > And speaking about past practices about release notes, I think we can improve on that TBH.
> > > We can move it down on the list if you want, but I'd rather keep it.
> > Is this the only crash fix we had? Moving crash fixes to the bottom of the list sounds good to me. 
> No, it wasn't. We also had one for init-expr global variable initializers. [[ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/558b46fde2db | See ]] 
> I swept that fix under the carpet of "Fixed some bugs around the handling of constant global arrays and their initializer expressions". I made it more explicit now.
> 
> However, at this point, I think it's okay to simply omit the mention of the null deref crash fix.
> Second thoughts?
I have no strong preference, I am fine with both :)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D155445/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D155445



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list