[PATCH] D146777: [clang] Preliminary fat-lto-object support

Wed Jul 12 18:20:19 PDT 2023

MaskRay added a comment.

In D146777#4491842 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146777#4491842>, @paulkirth wrote:

> Rebase and try to accomodate Unified LTO changes.
>
> Based on the Unified LTO patches, I think this is the correct handling for
> FatLTO, but I'd like to get a second opinion before landing this.
>
> CC: @ormris

Would you mind testing the behavior when both `-funified-lto -ffat-lto-objects` are specified and mentioning it in the summary? Some concrete instructions for end users will be very useful. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D123804#4491107 for what I suggested for -funified-lto.

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146777/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146777