[PATCH] D154283: [clang-tidy] Fix width/precision argument order in modernize-use-std-print
Piotr Zegar via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 3 09:37:11 PDT 2023
PiotrZSL added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/utils/FormatStringConverter.h:73
+ // puts the width and preicision first.
+ std::vector<std::tuple<unsigned, unsigned>> ArgRotates;
+
----------------
mikecrowe wrote:
> PiotrZSL wrote:
> > mikecrowe wrote:
> > > PiotrZSL wrote:
> > > > NOTE: You can use std::pair here.
> > > True, but in my mind `std::pair` only exists because `std::tuple` couldn't be implemented in the C++98.
> > >
> > > I was going to change it to use `std::pair` anyway, but I notice that I already use `std::tuple` for `ArgFixes` just above. Should I change both of them?
> > It will be compiled to same thing anyway. So it's up to you. Keep it consistent.
> > I personally use std::pair for 2 arguments, and std::tuple for more than 2.
> > But to be honest probably better would be to introduce some structure so that those two `unsigned` could be named. And probably same for ArgFixes, but there we got different types, so it's not a big problem.
> I think that you're probably right, but the names won't be used from the call site since I use structured binding there. Do you mind if I do both together in a separate commit?
Not a problem, lets leave it for a next change.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D154283/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D154283
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list