[PATCH] D153857: [clang] Fix new-expression with elaborated-type-specifier

Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 27 09:59:56 PDT 2023


aaron.ballman added a comment.

Thank you for the fix! Just to clarify some things before diving into the review too much... From the patch summary:

  Expressions like
  
  new struct A {};
  struct A* b = (1 == 1) ? new struct A : new struct A;
  Were parsed as definitions of struct A and failed, however as clarified by
  CWG2141 new-expression cannot define a type, so both these examples
  should be considered as valid.

There's a typo there -- the `new struct A{};` bit should be `struct A {};` (dropping the `new`), right?

I think the root cause of that issue is that we don't implement DR2141 (https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2141); are you intending to cover that DR? If so, there should be tests added to clang/test/CXX/drs/dr21xx.cpp.



================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Parse/Parser.h:2221
+    DSC_association, // A _Generic selection expression's type association
+    DSC_new          // C++ new operator
   };
----------------
Adding the comma so the next person doesn't have to, and realigning to the usual indentation


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153857/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153857



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list