[PATCH] D152924: [libLTO][AIX] Respect `-f[no]-integrated-as` on AIX

[ChenZheng via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

shchenz added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp:700
+    CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(
+        Twine(PluginOptPrefix) + "-no-integrated-as=" + NoIntegratedAs));
+  else if (!UseIntegratedAs) {
----------------
qiongsiwu1 wrote:
> shchenz wrote:
> > Seems other options leverage the default value in the back end, for example the default value for `DisableIntegratedAS` in backend is false, so when the front end requires integrated-as, maybe we can save the option here?
> Ah thanks for the comment! 
> 
> > maybe we can save the option here?
> 
> Could you help me understand what we mean by "the option"? Do we mean saving (or using?) the value of `-f[no]-integrated-as` explicitly here somehow instead of relying on `ToolChain.useIntegratedAs()`? How do we intend to use the saved option value? My understanding is that `DisableIntegratedAS` takes its value from the option `-no-integrated-as` if `-no-integrated-as` is specified. As pointed out eariler, `DisableIntegratedAS` is false by default. This code explicitly sets `-no-integrated-as` to `0` or `1`, so for the LTO use case, we overwrite the back end default since the option is always present. 
For example, if front-end requires to use integrated-assembler which is same with back-end's default value, we don't need to pass `-no-integrated-as=0`? We only pass the option `-no-integrated-as=1` when `if (IsOSAIX && !UseIntegratedAs)`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D152924/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D152924