[PATCH] D151839: [LinkerWrapper] Fix static library symbol resolution
Artem Belevich via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 31 16:19:45 PDT 2023
tra added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/linker-wrapper-libs.c:27
//
// Check that we extract a static library defining an undefined symbol.
//
----------------
jhuber6 wrote:
> tra wrote:
> > How does this test test the functionality of the undefined symbol? E.g. how does it fail now, before the patch?
> >
> > Is there an explicit check we could to do to make sure things work as intended as opposed to "there's no obvious error" which may also mean "we forgot to process *undefined.bc".
> Yeah, I wasn't sure how to define a good test for this. The problem I encountered before making this patch was that having another file that used an undefined symbol would override the `NewSymbol` check and then would prevent it from being extracted. So this checks that case.
AFAICT, with -DUNDEFINED, the file would have only `extern int sym;`. CE says suggests that it produces an embty bitcode file: https://godbolt.org/z/EY9a8Pfeb
What exactly is supposed to be in the `*.undefined.bc` ? If it's intended to have an undefined reference to `sym` you need to add some sort of a reference to it.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151839/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151839
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list