[PATCH] D151820: [clang][WebAssembly] Fix __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ under emscripten
Sam Clegg via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 31 13:48:37 PDT 2023
sbc100 added a comment.
In D151820#4385393 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151820#4385393>, @dschuff wrote:
> I guess this is basically the C version of max_align_t so it should match.
> but... this still has the potential to break things.
True, but I think it's not as likely the break things as that change the max_align_t.. which is more commonly used.
> e.g. it will change the allocation in https://github.com/google/XNNPACK/blob/master/src/xnnpack/allocator.h#L66
I don't think it will change anything in that code since `__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ >= XNN_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT` will still hold true both before and after this change (XNN_ALLOCATION_ALIGNMENT == 4 on wasm)
> ISTR that was one of the projects that had an issue with this the first time around?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151820/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151820
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list