[PATCH] D151192: [clang-tidy] have bugprone-unchecked-optional-access check boost::optional usage

[Giel van Schijndel via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

muggenhor added a comment.

Sure. Looking at the test I'm unsure though, are the `optional` implementations in there stripped copies of the real implementations? Or just a minimal implementation that fits the basic optional interface in the given namespace?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151192/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151192