[PATCH] D150689: [clang][DependencyScanner] Remove all warning flags when suppressing warnings

Jan Svoboda via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 16 10:06:36 PDT 2023


jansvoboda11 added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/ClangScanDeps/optimize-system-warnings.m:19
+// CHECK:            ],
+// CHECK-NEXT:       "name": "A"
+// CHECK-NEXT:     },
----------------
I'd like to see a check line that would fail if the scanner reports another variant of module `A`. The `CHECK:` lines make it possible for FileCheck to skip an entire element in the modules array. (Structural matching on JSON in FileCheck would be a godsend.)


================
Comment at: clang/test/ClangScanDeps/optimize-system-warnings.m:30
+// CHECK:            ],
+// CHECK-NEXT:       "name": "B"
+// CHECK-NEXT:     }
----------------
I'd expect the scanner to still produce two variants of module `B`, since it's a user module. Is that correct? If so, let's add explicit check for it, since we intentionally want to preserve the warning flags there.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150689/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150689



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list