[PATCH] D147591: [clang][Interp] Handle CXXTemporaryObjectExprs
Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 8 06:43:46 PDT 2023
aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/AST/Interp/records.cpp:317-318
{
- auto T = Test(Arr, Pos);
+ Test(Arr, Pos);
// End of scope, should destroy Test.
}
----------------
tbaeder wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > Nit: nothing actually tests that this object is destroyed correctly. Here's an interesting test to consider:
> > ```
> > struct S {
> > constexpr S() {}
> > constexpr ~S() noexcept(false) { throw 12; }
> > };
> >
> > constexpr int f() {
> > S{};
> > return 12;
> > }
> >
> > static_assert(f() == 12);
> > ```
> > That should fail because `~S()` would hit the `throw` expression and thus is not valid. Note, you'll need to add `-Wno-invalid-constexpr` to your test to avoid the warning-defaults-to-error about the destructor never producing a constant expression.
> There are multiple reasons why that sample is not rejected right now, one I can easily fix in a follow-up patch, the other one would actually require us to recognize the `throw` and reject it with a proper diagnostic.
We should definitely fix the `throw` at some point, but any of the dynamically reachable problematic constructs would work (`dynamic_cast` whose type would throw, invocation of the `va_arg` macro, `reinterpret_cast`, etc)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D147591/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D147591
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list