[PATCH] D147610: [RISCV][MC] Add support for experimental Zfbfmin extension

[Craig Topper via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

craig.topper added a comment.

In D147610#4294247 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147610#4294247>, @joshua-arch1 wrote:

> I'm wondering whether it is appropriate to just use FPR16 for the destination of fcvt.bf16.s? The destination is in BF16 format instead of simple FP16.  Your implemention looks like just replacing fcvt.h.s with fcvt.bf16.s. Do we need to define a new register class?

Registers classes only distinguished by the registers in them and what their alignment and spill size are. It doesn't define anything about the format of the register. A BF16 specific register class would be identical in those properties to the FPR16 register class.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147610/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147610