[PATCH] D147844: [clang][Sema]Print diagnostic warning about precedence when integer expression is used without parentheses in an conditional operator expression

[Christopher Di Bella via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

cjdb added a comment.

In D147844#4293693 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147844#4293693>, @dblaikie wrote:

>> I think some of the cases are ambiguous while others are not.
>
> Data would be good to have - if this assessment is true, we'd expect this to bear out in terms of bug finding, yeah? (that the cases you find to be ambiguous turn up as real bugs with some significant frequency in a codebase?)

I disagree that there's a need for bugs to add this warning. Reading ambiguous-but-correct code isn't going to be buggy, but it is going to cause readability issues for any reviewers or maintainers.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147844/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147844