[PATCH] D147920: [clang] Add test for CWG399

Tue Apr 11 01:30:37 PDT 2023

Endill added a comment.

I think I haven't stressed it enough, but this whole test is copied from dr244, which is written by Richard.

================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr3xx.cpp:1492
+    // This is technically ill-formed; G is looked up in 'N::' and is not found.
+    // Rejecting this seems correct, but most compilers accept, so we do also.
+    f.N::F::~G(); // expected-error {{qualified destructor name only found in lexical scope; omit the qualifier to find this type name by unqualified lookup}}
----------------
shafik wrote:
> You say we accept the next line but it has an `expected-error` on it?
It's an error because of `-pedantic-errors`. It's a warning by default.

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147920/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147920