[PATCH] D147717: [C++20][NFC] Claim full support for consteval again

[Christopher Di Bella via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

cjdb added a comment.

In D147717#4248989 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717#4248989>, @erichkeane wrote:

> @cjdb has been running some GDB test suites against our compiler: I am wondering if we could ask him to try the consteval ones too before we set this?

A lot of that work is manual because I need to interpret LIT messages to know wether something is a config error (e.g. missing `// expected-no-diagnostics`), a difference in opinion between compilers (e.g. GCC says it's an error and Clang says it's a note, reporting diagnostics on different lines, etc.), or actually an error in Clang.

I won't have time to check this week, but perhaps next week if the test set isn't too large (failing that, I'll at least try to get you `// expected-no-diagnostics` for improved confidence). Does this timeframe seem acceptable?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717