[PATCH] D147661: [Sema] Tweak merging of availability attributes
Erich Keane via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 6 10:07:03 PDT 2023
erichkeane added a comment.
In D147661#4249244 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661#4249244>, @rsandifo-arm wrote:
> In D147661#4249004 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661#4249004>, @erichkeane wrote:
>
>> This test doesn't show a change in behavior.
>
> Yeah. Is there a way to force the syntax and spelling fields to be dumped, even for implicit attributes? I was struggling to find one, which is why I wasn't sure this made a difference in practice.
>
> The patch is supposed to be a minor clean-up, since similar calls in surrounding code uses `AL` rather than `AL.getRange()`. The reason I originally hit this was that the series I'm working on removes the:
>
> AttributeCommonInfo(SourceRange)
> AttributeCommonInfo(SourceLocation)
>
> constructors (but keeps the ability to use `FooAttr::CreateImplicit` without more than a source range). It might be easier to explain why that seemed a good idea alongside the patches themselves.
>
> The two main uses of these constructors outside tablegen-generated code were the two in this patch and the one in https://reviews.llvm.org/D147657.
Ah, hrm... I don't have a really good idea of how to test this now then. Typically you'd have to do manual dump logic for an attribute like this i think? Perhaps @aaron.ballman knows better. I see the value to this, but I guess I want to see if we can capture the change somehow in a test.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D147661
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list