[PATCH] D146922: [clang-tidy] Fix false positve for defaulted move constructor in performance-noexcept-move-constructor
André Schackier via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 30 09:18:52 PDT 2023
AMS21 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:260
+- Fixed an issue in :doc:`performance-noexcept-move-constructor
+ <clang-tidy/checks/performance/noexcept-move-constructor>` which resulted in false
----------------
Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> Please keep alphabetical order (by check name) in this section.
Sure but I'm a bit confused. I assuming the check name is without the prefix so in this case `noexcept-move-constructor`. So it should be after `readability-avoid-underscore-in-googletest-name`. But why then is `use-after-move` sorted before `identifier-naming`.
I'm probably missing something very obvious.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146922/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146922
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list