[PATCH] D146026: [clangd] Patch PragmaMarks in preamble section of the file

Kadir Cetinkaya via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 14 07:37:29 PDT 2023


kadircet added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/Preamble.cpp:576
+
+std::vector<PragmaMark> getPragmaMarks(const ScannedPreamble &Modified) {
+  std::vector<PragmaMark> Marks;
----------------
hokein wrote:
> any reason not calling `collectPragmaMarksCallback` just like the https://reviews.llvm.org/D146028 for macros? is it for simplicity?
> 
> The pragma mark might be simple enough to parse ourselves, but it doesn't handle well for some trivial/corner cases like (well we probably don't care about these cases)
> 
> ```
> #pragma mark \
>    abc
> ```
yeah it was for not running it unnecessarily, but you're right I guess it's not worth the discrepancy. using `collectPragmaMarksCallback` instead.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146026/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146026



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list