[clang] 6ed67cc - [Coroutines] Remove -fcoroutines-ts

Bruno Cardoso Lopes via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 1 14:37:29 PST 2023


Makes total sense, thank you for the clarification.

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 6:24 PM chuanqi.xcq <yedeng.yd at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
>     We talked about removing `-fcoroutines-ts` in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59110
> and https://reviews.llvm.org/D108697. I raised the example you used here. And the conclusion
> is that this is the clang's policy for `-f*-ts` options. The same thing happens for -fconcepts-ts and
> -fmodules-ts. From my understanding, this is because we (clang) want less dialects and we want to
> focus on the form `-std=*`.
>
>     > If my understanding now is right, `-std=c++17 -fcoroutines` should work, right?
>
> `clang -std=c++17 -fcoroutines` shouldn't work. Since it is the same with `-fcoroutines-ts`.
> But if you want or you can't update to `-std=c++20` quickly, you can use
> `clang -std=c++17 -Xclang -fcoroutines` for the period of transition. But the `Xclang` options are
> for developers instead of the users. So we (the users) should update
> to `-std=c++20` or higher to use coroutines finally.
>
> Thanks,
> Chuanqi
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>
> Send Time:2023年2月28日(星期二) 06:51
> To:Chuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd at linux.alibaba.com>; Chuanqi Xu <llvmlistbot at llvm.org>
> Cc:cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject:Re: [clang] 6ed67cc - [Coroutines] Remove -fcoroutines-ts
>
> > I understand that the name "coroutines-ts" isn't meaningful these
> > days, but it also sounds like this commit does more than remove the
> > flag, it caps useful functionality. How are users supposed to use
> > c++17 with coroutines now? It's very common in our codebase and we
> > have users relying on it.
>
> Looks like I misread your patch, sorry! If my understanding now is
> right, `-std=c++17 -fcoroutines` should work, right? We should
> probably add an extra test in `clang/test/Driver/coroutines.cpp` that
> just test that (we currently just test when it's not).
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Bruno Cardoso Lopes
> http://www.brunocardoso.cc
>
>


-- 
Bruno Cardoso Lopes
http://www.brunocardoso.cc


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list