[PATCH] D144582: [include-cleaner] Always treat constructor calls as implicit

[Kadir Cetinkaya via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG279b4985ed4f: [include-cleaner] Always treat constructor calls as implicit (authored by kadircet).

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D144582/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D144582

Files:
  clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp
  clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp


Index: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@
   testWalk("struct $explicit^S {};", "^S *y;");
   testWalk("enum $explicit^E {};", "^E *y;");
   testWalk("struct $explicit^S { static int x; };", "int y = ^S::x;");
+  // One explicit call from the TypeLoc in constructor spelling, another
+  // implicit reference through the constructor call.
+  testWalk("struct $explicit^$implicit^S { static int x; };", "auto y = ^S();");
 }
 
 TEST(WalkAST, Alias) {
@@ -241,7 +244,7 @@
 TEST(WalkAST, ConstructExprs) {
   testWalk("struct $implicit^S {};", "S ^t;");
   testWalk("struct $implicit^S { S(); };", "S ^t;");
-  testWalk("struct $explicit^S { S(int); };", "S ^t(42);");
+  testWalk("struct $implicit^S { S(int); };", "S ^t(42);");
   testWalk("struct $implicit^S { S(int); };", "S t = ^42;");
   testWalk("namespace ns { struct S{}; } using ns::$implicit^S;", "S ^t;");
 }
Index: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp
+++ clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp
@@ -102,9 +102,12 @@
   }
 
   bool VisitCXXConstructExpr(CXXConstructExpr *E) {
+    // Always treat consturctor calls as implicit. We'll have an explicit
+    // reference for the constructor calls that mention the type-name (through
+    // TypeLocs). This reference only matters for cases where there's no
+    // explicit syntax at all or there're only braces.
     report(E->getLocation(), getMemberProvider(E->getType()),
-           E->getParenOrBraceRange().isValid() ? RefType::Explicit
-                                               : RefType::Implicit);
+           RefType::Implicit);
     return true;
   }
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D144582.499762.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1967 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20230223/9c5885f2/attachment.bin>