[clang] f952255 - Revert "[Clang][Sema] Enabled implicit conversion warning for CompoundAssignment operator."
NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 13 15:53:32 PST 2023
Author: NAKAMURA Takumi
Date: 2023-01-14T08:53:00+09:00
New Revision: f952255907a5a10925a565948f2ca8a61a826d92
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f952255907a5a10925a565948f2ca8a61a826d92
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f952255907a5a10925a565948f2ca8a61a826d92.diff
LOG: Revert "[Clang][Sema] Enabled implicit conversion warning for CompoundAssignment operator."
This reverts commit 4c37671a7c946ac246b52fa44a6a649b89d6310b,
aka llvmorg-16-init-17246-g4c37671a7c94
This caused many warnings in the current llvm codebase.
Added:
Modified:
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
clang/test/Sema/conversion-64-32.c
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 34b96789d38bb..a75bc1df2d7c9 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -351,9 +351,6 @@ Bug Fixes
Improvements to Clang's diagnostics
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-- Clang now supports implicit conversion warnings (``-Wsign-conversion``,
- ``Wshorten-64-to-32``, etc) for compound assignment operators (like +=, -=, <<=, >>= etc)
- with integral operands.
- Clang will now check compile-time determinable string literals as format strings.
Fixes `Issue 55805: <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55805>`_.
- ``-Wformat`` now recognizes ``%b`` for the ``printf``/``scanf`` family of
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
index b3834c830d7b7..1d956fadcf670 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
@@ -13508,13 +13508,8 @@ static void DiagnoseFloatingImpCast(Sema &S, Expr *E, QualType T,
}
}
-static void CheckImplicitConversion(Sema &S, Expr *E, QualType T,
- SourceLocation CC,
- bool *ICContext = nullptr,
- bool IsListInit = false);
-
/// Analyze the given compound assignment for the possible losing of
-/// floating-point precision and for implicit conversions for integral operands.
+/// floating-point precision.
static void AnalyzeCompoundAssignment(Sema &S, BinaryOperator *E) {
assert(isa<CompoundAssignOperator>(E) &&
"Must be compound assignment operation");
@@ -13531,17 +13526,8 @@ static void AnalyzeCompoundAssignment(Sema &S, BinaryOperator *E) {
->getComputationResultType()
->getAs<BuiltinType>();
- // Check for implicit conversions for compound assignment statements with
- // intergral operands.
- // FIXME: should this handle floating-point as well?
- if (E->getLHS()->getType()->isIntegerType() &&
- E->getRHS()->getType()->isIntegerType() && !E->isShiftAssignOp())
- CheckImplicitConversion(S, E->getRHS(), E->getType(),
- E->getRHS()->getExprLoc());
-
// The below checks assume source is floating point.
- if (!ResultBT || !RBT || !RBT->isFloatingPoint())
- return;
+ if (!ResultBT || !RBT || !RBT->isFloatingPoint()) return;
// If source is floating point but target is an integer.
if (ResultBT->isInteger())
@@ -13830,8 +13816,9 @@ static void DiagnoseIntInBoolContext(Sema &S, Expr *E) {
}
static void CheckImplicitConversion(Sema &S, Expr *E, QualType T,
- SourceLocation CC, bool *ICContext,
- bool IsListInit) {
+ SourceLocation CC,
+ bool *ICContext = nullptr,
+ bool IsListInit = false) {
if (E->isTypeDependent() || E->isValueDependent()) return;
const Type *Source = S.Context.getCanonicalType(E->getType()).getTypePtr();
diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/conversion-64-32.c b/clang/test/Sema/conversion-64-32.c
index 6b9d2e2ff35ae..3de20cb0fda3a 100644
--- a/clang/test/Sema/conversion-64-32.c
+++ b/clang/test/Sema/conversion-64-32.c
@@ -17,36 +17,3 @@ int4 test1(long2 a) {
int test2(long v) {
return v / 2; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision: 'long' to 'int'}}
}
-
-// rdar://10466193
-void test3(int i, long long ll) {
- i += ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i -= ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i *= ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i /= ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
-}
-
-void test4(int i, long long ll) {
- i += i-ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i += i+ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i -= i-ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i -= i+ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
-}
-
-void test5(int i, int j, long long ll) {
- i += (i-j)*ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i += (i+j)*ll; // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i -= ll/(i-j); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
- i -= ll/(i-j); // expected-warning {{implicit conversion loses integer precision}}
-}
-
-void test6(char c) {
- c <<= 999999; // expected-warning {{shift count >= width of type}} \
- // cxx17-warning {{shift count >= width of type}} \
- // ref-warning {{shift count >= width of type}} \
- // ref-cxx17-warning {{shift count >= width of type}}
- c >>= 999999; // expected-warning {{shift count >= width of type}} \
- // cxx17-warning {{shift count >= width of type}} \
- // ref-warning {{shift count >= width of type}} \
- // ref-cxx17-warning {{shift count >= width of type}}
-}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list