[PATCH] D135488: [codegen] Add a remarks based Stack Layout Analysis pass
Francis Visoiu Mistrih via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 12 16:30:13 PST 2023
thegameg added a comment.
In D135488#4049050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488#4049050>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> In D135488#4049035 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488#4049035>, @paulkirth wrote:
>
>> Actually if we add
>>
>> if (!isFunctionInPrintList(MF.getName()))
>> return false;
>>
>> we can filter by name
I would rather have a more generic mechanism for remarks or diagnostics in general. Even if it uses `isFunctionInPrintList`, I'd rather have a real flag that doesn't require `-mllvm`.
> Does name mangling complicate that? Perhaps a C++ user would give an unmangled name, but MF would be looking at mangled names?
Agreed. A regex would help a little there.
> Anyways, it's not a pressing issue. I won't block this patch on that. I just redirect all the output to a file then scan that.
You can easily process the yaml output from `-fsave-optimization-record` with the `optrecord` module:
import optrecord
import re
all_remarks, file_remarks, _ = optrecord.gather_results(optrecord.find_opt_files(<INPUT_FILE>), 1, False)
for r in optrecord.itervalues(all_remarks):
if re.match(<REGEX>, r.Function):
print(r)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D135488
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list