[PATCH] D139172: [clang] Mark CWG554 as N/A

[Vlad Serebrennikov via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Endill added a comment.

> There are many editorial issues that ended up as defect reports, you could probably batch many of them in subsequent PR

Thank you for suggestion. I'm being on a safer side at the moment, because CWG405 raised more questions than I anticipated.
I'll also wait until tomorrow morning (≈18 hours from now) to let everybody interested comment on this, to avoid situations like the one with CWG360 yesterday.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D139172/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D139172