[PATCH] D136815: [clang][Interp] Unify visiting variable declarations
Timm Bäder via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 1 07:33:05 PST 2022
tbaeder marked 4 inline comments as done.
tbaeder added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp:1127
return false;
- if (!this->emitInitGlobal(*T, *I, VD))
+ }
+ } else {
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> tbaeder wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > and if we have no `GlobalIndex`?
> > >
> > > Should this instead be:
> > > ```
> > > if (auto GlobalIndex = P.getGlobal(VD); !GlobalIndex || !this->emitGetPtrGlobal(*GlobalIndex, VD))
> > > return false;
> > > ```
> > >
> > I mean, that shouldn't happen because the `visitVarDecl` call before would've returned `false` in that case.
> The use of an `if` makes it seem like it could fail. Perhaps we should drop the `if` and use an `assert`?
What do you think about returning a `tuple(valid, offset)` from `visitVarDecl`? Although that might make the call in `ByteCodeStmtGen.cpp` a little awkward.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136815/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D136815
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list