[PATCH] D139095: [clang] Mark CWG405 as a duplicate of CWG218

[Vlad Serebrennikov via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Endill added a comment.

Is it fine that we're marking CWG405 as a duplicate even though it's not mentioned as such in official publication?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D139095/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D139095