[PATCH] D138597: DebugInfo: Add/support new DW_LANG codes for recent C and C++ versions

[Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

aprantl added a comment.

> @aprantl do you have an opinion on this? I tend to lean to the pedantic side on this kind of thing, but I'm persuadable.

As long as LLDB can deal with it I'm fine either way.
Emitting the separated DWARF 6 attribute as an extension sounds fine to me.



================
Comment at: llvm/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp:159
 
-  assert(((Lang <= dwarf::DW_LANG_Fortran08 && Lang >= dwarf::DW_LANG_C89) ||
+  assert(((Lang <= dwarf::DW_LANG_Ada2012 && Lang >= dwarf::DW_LANG_C89) ||
           (Lang <= dwarf::DW_LANG_hi_user && Lang >= dwarf::DW_LANG_lo_user)) &&
----------------
Should we define a DW_LANG_HI_DWARF in the .def file?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138597