[PATCH] D137943: [clangd] Mark "override" and "final" as keywords
Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 21 02:25:44 PST 2022
sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM with optional mechanical replacement of `Keyword` with `Modifier`.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.h:52
Macro,
+ Keyword,
----------------
LSP provides both `keyword` and `modifier`, which obviously overlap.
I think `modifier` is more specific and applies here, so would lean towards that. WDYT?
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp:868
+ // override and final
+ R"cpp(
+ class $Class_def_abstract[[Base]] { virtual void $Method_decl_abstract_virtual[[m]]() = 0; };
----------------
can you add something like `int override, final;` to check that these are *not* highlighted?
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp:872
+ class $Class_def[[MoreDerived]] : public $Class[[Derived]] { void $Method_decl_virtual[[m]]() $Keyword[[final]]; };
// Issue 1222: readonly modifier for generic parameter
+ )cpp",
----------------
this comment should not be inside the string literal
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137943/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137943
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list