[PATCH] D137753: [Clang][GNU][AIX][p]Enable -p Functionality
Michael Francis via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 17 16:29:13 PST 2022
francii added a comment.
Recall that the goal with `-p` is to create parity with GCC (at least with Linux and AIX), as per the RFC discussion.
In D137753#3935138 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137753#3935138>, @MaskRay wrote:
> In D137753#3935126 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137753#3935126>, @francii wrote:
>
>> In D137753#3934932 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137753#3934932>, @MaskRay wrote:
>>
>>> Please make `-p` accepted for AIX only and don't change the semantics for other targets in this patch. For FreeBSD and Linux (musl and gnu) we can try rejecting `-p`. If OpenBSD wants to make `-p` an alias for `-pg`, that's fine.
>>
>> We can make `-p` emit a message on Linux while also accepting it as an alias to `-pg`. Do you have a suggestion as to what that message would be?
>
> The current `warning: argument unused during compilation: '-p' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]` is good for Linux.
> In the future Linux can try removing `-p`.
The current behaviour of ignoring the option without stopping with an error return code is not a good one.
Recall that the goal is to create parity with GCC, as per the RFC post.
Is there a reason this flag shouldn't be supported on Linux? Specifically, what is your justification for diverging from GCC on this matter?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137753/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137753
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list