[PATCH] D137486: [clang-format] Correctly annotate function names before attributes

[Owen Pan via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

owenpan added a comment.

In D137486#3909970 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137486#3909970>, @rymiel wrote:

> Are both isCpp11AttributeSpecifier and isCppAttribute required?

Not really, but I've kept `isCpp11AttributeSpecifier` for now as it might become handy if it needs to be called at other places when we add an option for breaking after C++ attributes. Otherwise, I will remove it in a separate patch.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137486/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137486